1949--All the King's Men, Robert Rossen
Nominated: Battleground, The Heiress, A Letter to Three Wives, Twelve O' Clock High
Should Have Won: Adam's Rib
Be Sure to See: Long Haired Hare, The Third Man, White Heat
"I'm gonna run. You're not gonna stop me. I'm gonna run even if I don't get a single vote."--Willie Stark
All the King's Men
is an odd film. It is odd because, even though it isn't bad, it is
very forgettable. I watched it. I liked it okay. I returned it. Then
a few hours later I figured I should pop it in so I can watch it for
this review. Then it donned on me I had already seen it. It is
forgettable yet somewhat enjoyable, mainly because of Roderick
Crawford in the lead as a corrupt politician. Mercedes McCambridge
was also a standout in an Oscar winning role but whenever she spoke I
couldn't help but remember she was the voice of the possessed Reagan
who Linda Blair embodied in The Exorcist.
It was unavoidable.
Stark
is certainly a villain in the movie but I kind of liked his
personality. He came across as a mix of Lee J. Cobb and a hardcore
serious Rodney Dangerfield, at least that is what he sounded like. He
has a few powerful moments, in particular the speech he gives about
how he used to be a hick. Some turbulence arises when his son, who is
a football player (a running back who wears 73. You football fans will see the problem there) is involved in
a bad car wreck and he is corrupt in his use of blackmail. The situation gets tricky because the person
he blackmails is someone who used to blackmail people thirty years
before...I think.
If
you are into politics, I would recommend this movie to you. I am not
really a political person so I liked it for the performances, especially Crawford and
McCambridge. But you know back in high school when you had to read a
book and a few pages into a chapter you forgot what you read? That is
how this movie is to me.
The remake was much closer to the tone of the book and therefore much better. The book is a masterpiece. It's the Great American Novel.
ReplyDelete