1956--Around the World in 80 Days, Michael Anderson
Nominated: Friendly Persuasion, Giant, The King and I, The Ten Commandments
Should Have Won: The Ten Commandments
Be Sure to See: The Bad Seed, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Man Who Knew Too Much, The Searchers
"Why hang me for a sheep-stealing son of a tarantula. If you ain't a pack of yellow-bellied milk stops,"--Col. Proctor Stamp
Jules Verne's classic
tale Around the World in 80 Days was
adapted into at least three films. One starred martial arts expert
Jackie Chan and a previous one featured Pierce Brosnan. Decades
before, it had been adapted into a version which won the Academy
Award for best picture. It is a shame because the 1956 winner does
not deserve to have “Oscar” anywhere near its title. The only
interesting thing about this movie is it is that producer Michael
Todd coined the term “cameo” and that this movie is the only
feature length film he ever produced, and it won. Talk about batting
a thousand.
Well
that isn't the only interesting thing about the movie. The first few
minutes are also amusing because it opens by showing clips from the
classic 1902 film A Trip to the Moon (which
comes highly recommended, I might add; it is on youtube. Watch it). After
that setup there is a six and a half minute intro about rocket travel
and Verne's ideas before the actual movie began. I'm not sure if that
is part of the actual movie or added to my disk. I could rent a
different copy but, to tell the truth, I don't want to.
It is
September 21, 1872 (75 years to the day before Stephen King was born,
I'll have you know), and
Phileas
Fogg has made a wager with members of his men's club he can travel
around the world in 80 days. The men take that bet and Fogg grabs
three shirts, two pairs of pants, and his valet named Passerpartout
and they begin their journey. It starts in a balloon but proceeds to
trains and boats. Along the way, Princess Aouda (the lovely Shirley
MacLaine; in four years she will star in another best picture winner
and it is that movie I developed a little crush on her) joins them.
They run into a few setbacks and so on, all the while the police are
suspicious that he stole 55,000 pounds from a bank.
Some
movies like this can work but most I've seen are a mess. Rat
Race, Cannonball Run, and even
the quasi-acclaimed It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World (which
I didn't care too much for but is worth a look on a rainy day) are
examples of films that, for me, never should have left the starting
post. Movies
like this are frustrating because I lose my interest. Around the
World in 80 Days was frustrating because on top of losing my
interest it was long, at just over three hours. There is one span of
over four minutes of nothing but Passepartout looking out a train
window. Later, when they've reached America, there is an Indian
attack and the rubber arrows bounce off of Passepartout like it was a
middle school play.
Some
of it was good. I liked what Fogg does when the steamship was running
out of power. And whether or not he wins the bet was handled well,
leading the viewer in different directions. The movie runs about a
minute too long. though. When the bet is settled it seems like a good
place to end. Then the final ten seconds make up one of the lousiest
final scenes in movie history. I can only imagine it was debated on during post-production on whether to keep it or scrap it. They arrived at the wrong choice. And it should also be noted that a man
named Reginald Denny played a police inspector. Wasn't he the truck
driver who was beaten during the Rodney King riots? Look that up on a
rainy day, but skip this mess.
I saw this movie only once and I thought it was extremely boring. Enough said.
ReplyDeleteMy pick for this year would have been The King and I.
ReplyDelete