1991--The Silence of the
Lambs, Jonathan Demme
Nominated: Beauty and
the Beast, Bugsy, JFK, Prince of Tides
Should have won: Boyz n
the Hood
Be sure to see: Cape Fear, Chopper Chicks in Zombietown, City Slickers, My Girl, The People Under the Stairs,
Terminator 2
“Most serial killers
keep some sort of trophies from their victims”--Clarice Starling
“I didn't”--Hannibal
Lecter
“No. No, you ate
yours”--Clarice Starling
In the 87 years of the
Academy Awards, Silence of the Lambs is
the only horror movie to win best picture of the year, and it
took until the 64th year of the awards to get it. Of
course there are 12 horror movies I think should have won, especially Rosemary's Baby and The Exorcist, and they are listed at the bottom of this piece. There are those who consider 1940's winner Rebecca to be
horror but I don't. Heck, there are some that don't even consider
this film to be horror despite the fact it deals with a cannibal and
a man who wears YOU as clothing. Um, yeah, that's horror people.
The FBI is tracking a
serial killer who calls himself Buffalo Bill who has been starving,
skinning, and wearing his victims. The character is modeled after Ed Gein, the Wisconsin weirdo who also inspired
Norman Bates and Leatherface. FBI trainee Clarice Starling is put on
the case and interviews Hannibal Lecter, a former psychiatrist and
cannibalistic madman who is the hospital for the criminally insane,
in hopes he might lead her to the killer. The clock is ticking as
Bill's next victim will be a U.S. Senator's daughter who is kept in a
hole, starving, until the right time to be skinned.
This movie was pretty
much a shoe-in for best picture. Of the other nominees, the most
intriguing story is Beauty and the Beast becoming
the first animated movie to be nominated for best picture. The
only reason I put Boyz n the Hood as my should have won is
because of what the directors had to deal with. Johnathan Demme had
top notch actors, from top to bottom; John Singleton had mostly
unseasoned actors with a few experienced ones here and there. Boyz
n the Hood is a must see to anyone over the age of 13, regardless
of race. It is well shot, directed, written, and acted but most
importantly the message is a bull's eye. That being said, Silence
of the Lambs is an achievement in its own right. It is a creepy,
nail biting film with an unsettling ending. I don't blame the Academy
for going this direction and, as a horror fan, am happy it was
acknowledged. Yes, I put Boyz in the “should have won”
line but perhaps as a wink and nudge. I can tell you I like watching
it more than I do Silence of the Lambs, but the latter is the
better all around film, so the Academy probably got it right.
The film manages to
capture fans of various genres. It can be gruesome in spots yet shies
away from being overly gory, therefore not turning away potential
audiences. Its grim, gray West Virginia overcasts offer a bleak mood
and it is one of those rare films where we have a tendency to root
for the bad guy...well one of them, anyway. The movie is filled with
danger and having an inexperienced agent dealing with two deranged
psychopaths heightens the danger even more. This movie comes
recommended to most people, even the squeamish because even through
some of the sick images a strong crime drama shines through.
Two things to consider,
one fact another opinion. Silence of the Lambs joins1934's
It Happened One Night
and 1975's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest as
the only three movies to ever win the five main categories at the
Oscars: Best picture, director, actor, actress, and screenplay.
One other note I can't
leave out: The American Film Institute made a list of the 50 greatest
heroes and 50 greatest villains and Hannibal Lecter topped the list
of villains. I can tell you this, I completely disagree with that
choice; he isn't even the better villain IN THIS MOVIE!!! I've never appreciated the lack of respect Buffalo Bill and Ted Levine, the actor who played him, get. Without Hannibal Lecter, we could still have a movie about an agent tracking a serial killer; without Buffalo Bill, there would be no movie.
Horror fans take a lot of pride in this movie because, for the most part, the genre gets disrespected by non-fans. It is like this movie sneaks in through the back door disguised as a crime thriller, making audiences forget about the gruesome undertones. Also, look for Night of the Living Dead and Dawn of the Dead creator George Romero in a cameo. It has been nearly a quarter century since Silence of the Lambs won
the Oscar. It is about time another horror picture is made that is
worthy of winning a second one.
--Note: Horror movies I think legitimately should have won best picture--Frankenstein (1931), Freaks (1932), King Kong (1933), Bride of Frankenstein (1935), Cat People (1942), Psycho (1960), Rosemary's Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Sixth Sense (1999), Shadow of the Vampire (2000), King Kong (2005), Let the Right One In (2008),
Oki,this movie was tense,exciting,revolting and well acted but it did not "scare"me. I thought that all the characters were developed completely and the creepyness was because the the tension of the actors not the story itself.
ReplyDeleteYes, the themes were scarier than the presentation. But it is very well made. It is just a good mainstream movie that happens to be horror as well, like Rosemary's Baby. And it is crazy how Anthony Hopkins got the best actor win and has barely any screen time. Like I said, Ted Levin as Buffalo Bill impressed me a lot more.
ReplyDelete