Thursday, June 11, 2015

2011--The Artist, Michael Hazanavicius

Image result for The Artist
2011--The Artist, Michel Hazanavicius
Nominated: The Descendants, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, The Help, Hugo, Midnight in Paris, Moneyball, The Tree of Life, War Horse
Should have won: The Artist
Be sure to see: Contagion, Hannah, Insidious, The Muppets, Rise of the Planet of the Apes, Sinister, Super 8
“I won't work anymore, it's him or me. What I mean is it's him and me. Or it's neither of us. Hey, I'm blackmailing you, get it?”--Peppy Miller

     Right off the bat I have to mention that on a personal note I was intrigued by The Artist the first time I saw it in part because Peppy (Berenice Bejo) looked exactly like a woman I was dating at the time. Looking at the actress' profile I saw she had appeared in a lot of projects but I'd never seen her before. She is from Argentina and hopefully her career takes off. Upon rewatching a couple of years after I wasn't dating her doppleganger, I still enjoyed it. It is my third favorite winner of the 21st century to date. But it also seems to be one of the least accepted movies ever made.

     The movie is silent, and takes a similar cue from Singin' in the Rain of how a silent star would be affected by the advent of talkies. I have seen around 20 or so silent movies. I enjoy them; I think they have a special charm about them, but I understand why they wouldn't appeal to modern audiences. What I don't understand, however, is why someone would see it knowing they wouldn't like it and then complain later. Some people just wouldn't like a silent movie, you know who you are, and there is nothing wrong with that. However, there is something wrong with seeing one and then complaining later. Did you not see a preview? Did you walk in blindfolded, unknowing what you were going into? The concept is brilliant. You see period pieces all the time. Civil War films, movies about life in the 1940s, etc. What is wrong with making one about the silent era that dares to be silent itself? I applaud this decision and also want to wink at Mel Brooks for making Silent Movie in 1976.

     In 1927 Hollywood, silent film star George Valentin shines on the screen. As a mob of fans surround a press shoot, Peppy Miller, a fan, inadvertently bumps into him. Their picture together is printed in the newspaper, and she takes the occurrence and uses it to her advantage, auditioning for a bit part in a movie. As her screen credits rise slightly each picture she makes, the new talkies cause Valentin to slide off the radar. Her new found fame goes to Peppy’s head, but all the while still has a little love for Valentin. You can sense a chemistry in one of the best scenes when Peppy is still an extra and George is a star. There is a scene that is shot in five takes in which they briefly dance with each other as George makes his way across a crowded room. You can sense a spark.

     The movie is loaded with bit characters and memorable scenes like Valentin's auction when his career is in shambles, the dog racing to find a police officer, Peppy's date telling Valentin that his father is a fan, a wonderful solo scene of Peppy being seduced by George's coat, and of course that final scene which was said to take 18 takes to get right. I won't reveal what this scene is because it is a solution to what will make George relevant again. I also like the scene where George is contemplating suicide while Peppy is rushing to be by his side, particularly the surprising climax.

     The novelty of a black and white silent movie in the 21st century is part of the movie's charm but beyond that it is a good story and a pleasure to watch. A big selling point is the acts of the dog but I didn't feel very impressed by them. I've seen better stunts by other animals in movies. In one particular sequence it appears Valentin and the dog are doing the same motions together. Looking closely you'll see the dog acts first and Jean Dujardin just followed.

     Dujardin won best actor over George Clooney for The Descendants which I don't agree with but I was hoping Berenice Bejo had won her supporting actress award which she lost. If you haven't seen any silent movies, I recommend you pick up a Charlie Chaplin or Harold Lloyd movie to start off, Safety Last! would do nicely. My first was Nosferatu, the greatest vampire movie ever made. Perhaps A Trip to the Moon since it is shorter. Eventually, I'd recommend checking out classics like Phantom of the Opera or City Lights. But it would be fine to begin with The Artist, too. Other than one gimmicky segment in the middle, the movie looks like it could have come right out of the silent era. I've heard people complain about making a silent movie in the 21st century but why not? I'm surprised there haven't been more examples to tell you the truth. It comes recommended. Beyond the silent aspect it is a good story and a romantic experience. 
Image result for The Artist
 

No comments:

Post a Comment